On
the one hand, I find that this idea is awesome and Mark Zuckerberg is
kindly. Here we have an example of someone who wants to help and he
does it by the way he's skilled. But thinking about it seriously, I
don't think that's so good. Letting apart that Mark Zuckerberg is
being solidary and society committed, I think as myself being a
refugee and I wouldn't like that they make internet a preference to
me while I'm not having a house, money and either a land in peace. I
would prefer to get some place to rest in peace whit all my beloved
people. But, at least, any help is needed, so thank you Mark
Zuckerberg for this initiative and I hope that some other “big
fishes” take example from him.
On
the other hand, to transform internet in a human right it's something
I also find well, but not a priority. It is a fact that nowadays,
internet works as a substitute of everything, for example, books,
shops, post, school... and it's so useful for anybody because it
helps a lot on daily life, but it's important that you have basically
things before having internet. My suggestion to transform internet in
a human right it is to make it free for everyone in the world,
because, in fact, internet companies earn most of the money that we
pay for it. It would be also great to create special items for those
who wants some enhances and make them pay for it. By doing this
transformation, everyone will be able to educate themselves or
anything using the internet connexion.
In
short, internet is a useful utensil, but it is not essential.